While many people like "smoky" notes in their wine, they have no taste of an ashtray. But that is exactly what can happen with wine made with smoked soiled grapes. Forest fires produce an excessive amount of by-products from smoke combustion, and at present many of the fires are now raging in the wine country. Since the wildfire season is in line with the wine-growing season, smoked grapes are an unfortunate reality – especially this wildfire season.
Insurance claims for smoke damage to grapes can be very tricky. During a wildfire, particles called "volatile phenols" can come in contact with grapes and be absorbed through the skin. The phenols are rapidly absorbed and bind to sugar. Once bound with sugar, the phenols become tasteless until the bond breaks, usually after fermentation. At this point, the ashtray taste returns and the Wine Spectator score drops by 20 points. There are many steps needed to properly deal with the insurance side of this problem. Here are some important tips.
Identify the date of smoke contact as soon as possible. Were the grapes on the vine or did they pick? Grapes on the vine are not covered by private insurance but can be covered by Federal Crop Insurance Corporation. Picked grapes are covered, and usually wine is in progress. However, smoke color is only covered by special policies or approvals and is not included in basic business owner policies (or homeowner policies for those who grow grapes on their private property). The claims steps for private insurance are likely to differ from the steps provided for in the Federal Crop Insurance Act.
Another smart step is to send some grapes for laboratory tests. Do this as soon as possible this year, as the number of claims is already blocking a few wine science experts out there. There is no substitute for laboratory tests. Smoke color can not be detected by trying the grapes because the taste is hidden by the sugar binding. Labs can determine the levels of important phenols such as guaiacol and 4-methylguaiacol that lead to the dirty taste after fermentation. dirty taste. Many vineyard insurance companies only pay as a result of infected wine if it seems likely that the infection could have been avoided before fermentation. In other words, if dirt was likely before fermentation, the insurer will not pay for post-fermentation pain. Thus, you will want a formal opinion even if it is not decisive ̵
It is also important to get a professional opinion on the likelihood that stain can be avoided or minimized during the winemaking process. Winemakers often continue with grapes that are exposed to smoke because it is not always possible to tell by testing whether the wine will eventually become infected. Winemakers have been dealing with smoking problems long enough and have developed some processes to minimize the effect, such as reverse osmosis. However, there are no processes that guarantee that wine is avoided. If you decide to add other grapes to compensate for the risk of dirt or take other measures, be sure to keep track of exactly what you are doing and document the expected results in real time. All this information is important if there is an insurance claim.
Getting through these initial but important steps is not always easy as many winemakers do not grow their own grapes and many grape growers do not produce their own wine. If you buy the grapes, make sure you ask the right questions about when the smoke hit the grapes and the result of any tests. Perform your own tests as well. If you are a seller, make sure you have tested the grapes and received an opinion to protect yourself if the seller later claims that the wine is infected. Also try to get some understanding of what the winemaking process will mean, including whether the grapes will be mixed with others, if any additives or flavors are used, and if the winemaker will try some processes to undo the smoke. If possible, practice agreements in advance for what happens if the wine is finally soiled, including agreements for the winemaker that reveal everything they do with the grapes after purchasing them. For example, if they add grapes to another grower, how can you be sure which grapes have infected the wine if there is insufficient information or if the winemaker will not disclose that information?
Once the wine has been made, if there is a minor taste, the insurance claim value must also be documented. Most insurance companies only pay for the lost market value. In other words, if the bottle had been sold for $ 150 without the smoke being stained, but now has two-chuck quality, the measure of loss is $ 148.
Determining the market price can be very challenging, especially for artisans or newer winemakers. The less history the wine has on the market, the more difficult it is to prove the magnitude of the loss. In addition, while advanced winemakers do not want to outsource two-chuck-chuck, the insurer will still want to know what it could have sold for and reduce your compensation by so much. So consider options to sell stained wine in some other way.
There are many other factors to analyze for claims about smoke spots, and it is time consuming and costly to prepare a vineyard requirement properly. Consider retaining an experienced professional to guide you through the insurance process to avoid problems along the way. In addition, so that you can focus on what it means – to produce and sell good wine.
If you want to learn more about wildfire smoking requirements I will discuss this and other topics when I fill in for Chip this afternoon for Tuesday at 2 with Chip Merlin .
Here is a link to the live stream today at 14:00 (ET). I hope you can join me.