(Reuters) – The US Supreme Court on Thursday barred a proposed class action lawsuit accusing Facebook Inc. of violating a federal law against anti-mobile calls and saving social media companies from a potentially costly battle over unwanted text messages.  The judges, in a 9-0 decision written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, backed Facebook in their appeal of a lower court decision that revived the trial, claiming that the text messages violated the Consumer Protection Act, a 1991 law that sought to limit telemarketing abuse. by banning most unauthorized cell phone calls.
The court found that Facebook's documents, sending text messages without consent, did not fit within the technical definition of the type of conduct hindered by the law, which was adopted before the advent of modern mobile phones.
The lawsuit was filed in 201
The case highlighted the challenge for justice to apply outdated laws to modern technology. In this case, the trial claimed that Facebook's system that sent automated text messages was similar to a traditional automated dialing system, known as an autodialer, used to send robocalls.
as smoothly as he would have liked ", wrote Justice Sotomayor.
The law requires that the equipment used must use a" random or sequential speech generator "but the court ruled that Facebook's system" does not use such technology, "Justice Sotomayor added.
Mr Duguid said that Facebook repeatedly sent him login messages via text message to his mobile phone even though he was not a Facebook user and had never done so. Despite many efforts, Duguid said he could not prevent Facebook from " robotexta "him.
Facebook replied that Duguid had probably been assigned a phone number that was previously associated with a Facebook user who had chosen to receive the messages.
A federal judge threw out the trial but in 2019 revived the 9: The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco on January 20, 2006 devices that automatically dial randomly generated numbers but also stored numbers that are not randomly generated.