قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Insurance / Setting the correct prism for interpreting policy language in COVID-19 business interruption cases can be crucial

Setting the correct prism for interpreting policy language in COVID-19 business interruption cases can be crucial



On September 29, 2020, The National Law Review published an article by Scott DeVries, Lorie Masters and Michael Huggins on setting the right prism for the interpretation of political language, which may be determined in COVID -19 Business Interruption Cases. An important passage from the article is that a court's compliance with traditional principles for interpreting insurance can lead to more cases supporting business interruption coverage for COVID-19-related claims. For example, relevant interpretation principles include, among other things, that policy terms are ambiguous if they are subject to more than a reasonable interpretation and that ambiguity is interpreted in favor of coverage. In COVID-1

9 coverage cases decided so far, these principles seem to have been lost in the binary discussion of "who is right." By refocusing on the need to conduct a traditional insurance analysis, courts will make a proper analysis of the issues at stake in these cases, and policyholders should continue to gain ground in the ongoing debate on business interruption for losses. due to COVID-19.


Source link