The Patient Protection Act and Affordable Care Act ("ACA") mandate that group health plans and health insurance companies "provide coverage" and "do not impose cost-sharing requirements for" certain types of preventive health services, including comprehensive breastfeeding support and counseling services ( "CLS"). ACA defines cost sharing as "deductible, coin insurance, repayments" and other expenses required by an insured with respect to significant health benefits covered by a group health plan. Jillian York and Jody Bailey, members of the group health plans covered by the mandate, claimed compensation for CLS provided by out-of-network providers. The Wellmark Health Plan of Iowa, Inc., and the Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Iowa (collectively, "Wellmark") refused to cover these costs.
I Jillian York; Jody Bailey, for herself and everyone else similarly located v. Wellmark, Inc., d / b / a Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Iowa; et al., No. 1
Jillian York joined the UIChoice group's health plan through her job at the University of Iowa. The plan's coverage manual explains a network of suppliers listed in the manual. All other medical providers are considered outside the network.
In early 2016, York chose to deliver her child to the UIHC, which she knew was a UIChoice networking facility. While pregnant, she had a prenatal consultation with Deborah Hubbard, a registered nurse and International Board Certified Lactation Consultant ("IBCLC") who runs UIHC's breastfeeding clinic. When problems arose in early March, York consulted Mary Johnson, an IBCLC at the UIHC, who created a personal care plan. Johnson claimed that York's son did not transfer milk due to a heavy bond and told York to "seek help elsewhere" because Johnson "had very little experience" with this problem. York was not charged for these services and consultations.
A dentist then performed a frenectomy to correct her son's tongue, encouraged York to "follow up on a knowledgeable IBCLC" and referred her to Jen Pitkin. A representative confirmed that the plan included breastfeeding services but could not identify a CLS provider in Wellmark's network. The representative stated that Pitkin was connected to a facility in the network and advised York to ask if Pitkin could invoice through that facility so that York could receive benefits in the network. York instead met Pitkin, received a $ 65 fee and sought a refund from the UIChoice plan for that fee. Wellmark denied the allegation.
QUESTIONS ABOUT SUSPENSION OF ORDERS
The plaintiff appeals against the rejection of allegations that Wellmark violates cost sharing and demands for information and disclosure of the ACA mandate. Because York was a member of a UIChoice group health plan not regulated by ERISA, her non-life insurance is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Iowa, as expressly stated in the coverage manual.
Because they could not get a referral to the necessary experts the plaintiffs claimed that there was a face plausible violation of the ACA's preventive health care mandate.
In rejecting these claims, the district court carefully noted that neither the statutory mandate nor its implementing rules require disclosure of information – including a list of suppliers – or prohibit "administrative barriers" or "inconsistent guidance." The mandate's implementing regulations do not include information and requirements for publication.
Bailey seeks relief under a group health plan regulated by ERISA, which prevents state laws. Although the ACA does not impose "information and disclosure requirements", ERISA grants a private right of action for an alleged breach of a plan administrator's obligation to distribute written communications that are accurate and comprehensive enough to reasonably reach participants and beneficiaries of their rights and obligations under the plan. But Bailey did not allege a breach of that obligation. Rather, it claims that the ACA mandate and its implementing rules provide for a categorical oversight obligation for ERISA group health care administrators to publish a "separate list" of lactation counseling providers. She was wrong, the health plan only needs to provide a list of network providers and describe when services outside the network are covered.
Summary of court issues.
The implementing rules of the ACA mandate provide that a group health plan or issuer may refuse coverage or introduce cost sharing for articles and services "performed by an off-network provider" if the plan or issuer has [s] in its network a supplier who can provide an article or service. "
ACA does not use the term "network of providers." An implementing regulation provides that a plan or issuer may refuse coverage or introduce cost sharing for objects and services "performed by an off-network provider" if the plan or issuer "has [s] in its network a provider that can provide an item or service."  Adopting the complainants' interpretation would require the court to amend the contracts that state-regulated group insurance policies negotiate with medical providers. , during their inpatient care and after discharge from the hospital, they received these services free of charge from Certified Lactation Consultants at the UIHC, a facility on the network 70 miles from York's home and ten to fifteen minutes from Bailey & # 39; s…. do not provide lactation consultants, but more, does not prove that Wellmark lacked network providers who can provide comprehensive lactation services.
Difficulties in scheduling a meeting with a supplier do not show that the insurer does not meet the requirements. Furthermore, the summary judgment stated that Wellmark provided York and Bailey with qualified, available providers of CLS in the network.
The Eighth Circuit concluded that the district court did not err in granting a summary judgment rejecting the appellants' cost-sharing claim.  It seems that the public, like the two ladies who tried to file a complaint due to the refusal to pay a claim of $ 65, simply believe that the ACA guaranteed that all medical services would be free. It was obvious that this was not the case. The women received the services promised to them and even the ACA did not require the health insurer to provide free services for all possible situations. Insurances and statutes must be read in their entirety and applied as written. Courts cannot change contracts and cannot even consider amending a clear and unambiguous statute.
© 2020 – Barry Zalma. He also acts as arbitrator or mediator for insurance-related disputes. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance protection and attorney management attorney and more than 52 years in the insurance industry. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and firstname.lastname@example.org.
Mr. Zalma is the first recipient of the first annual Claims Magazine / ACE Legend Award.
For the past 52 years, Barry Zalma has devoted his life to insurance, insurance claims and the need to defeat insurance fraud. He has created the following libraries of books and other materials to enable insurance companies and their claims staff to become professional insurance claims.
Read posts from Barry Zalma at https://parler.com/profile/Zalma/posts  Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube-
Go to the library for insurance claims – https: // zalma. com / blog / insurance-claims-library / Chapter19459010 ???? 19659002 Premium19459007 unsubscribe from e-mail version of ZIFL, it's free! –
Read the last two questions by ZIFL here. https://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/vud19459010????191959002????19459007 ?? Go to the Barry Zalma, Inc. website here https://www.zalma.com/??19459010]
Listen to my podcast, Zalma on Insurance, on:
https://podcasts.google.com/?q=zalma%20on%20insuranceZalma on Insurance –