A California Highway Patrol officer who appealed not to compete against theft in connection with concealing the true extent of his disability after a workplace injury must pay investigation costs as part of court restoration decisions, a state appeals court ruled Monday.  After monitoring as part of the fraud investigation of both the CHP and the State Compensation Insurance Fund and a court decision to pay $ 71,509 as part of his repayment, Daniel Cory Clapp appealed, arguing that "as public investigators neither SCIF nor CHP are entitled to compensation. for the costs of investigating his claim, according to documents in The People v. Daniel Cory Clapp filed with the Court of Appeal of California's Third District of Appeal in Sacramento.
CHP officials logged 1
In total, Mr. Clapp collected $ 111 863 in injuries and invalidity benefits.Clapps assertion that he should not pay for u the conclusion and the conclusion that "as direct victims of the defendant's fraud, both the CHP and the SCIF are entitled to reimbursement of investigation costs incurred in an attempt to justify termination of payments and to recover money that the defendant fraudulently received."
The court also wrote that "refusing the agencies' reimbursement here would lead to a rule that encourages public entities to incur expenses for external investigators rather than trying to investigate the case internally."