See the full video at https://youtu.be/e7FSHw-IY0M and at https://rumble.com/v16ul9c-damages-for-breach-of-an-insurance-policy.html
In general, the purpose of damages for breach of contract is to compensate the injured party and provide the benefits promised in the contract. The general rule is that the damages aim to put the injured party in the same situation as if the agreement had been fulfilled.
In the 16th century, when our English ancestors began to settle disputes through jury trials rather than trials or disputes, courts were divided into courts and fair courts. The courts dealt with damages for various crimes such as breaches of contract, negligence or intentional tort.
To discourage people from breaking contracts, the law allows various measures for the party to the contract who lost the benefit of the purchase. If a crime is proven, a court can rule:
- specific performance,
- termination of contract, and
- contract modification or reform.
While British Common Law formed damages, the province was a court of law while the other three remedies were handled by a fair court. In the 16thth For centuries, the courts of equality were run by priests, who were believed to be better qualified than appointed judges, in order to provide the justice required for a fair trial.
The damages awarded for breach of contract were limited to damages. This is compensation for an amount of money intended to compensate the non-criminal party for losses resulting from the infringement. The purpose of damages is to “make the injured party whole again” but not put the non-criminal party in a better situation than the terms of the contract presuppose.
Damages for breach of contract were traditionally limited to the need to compensate the plaintiff for the damage immediately caused by the breach. Damages must have been considered by the parties or be reasonably foreseeable at the time the agreement was entered into. Contractual damages usually do not allow recovery for unforeseen damage or damage, as well as damages for damages caused by damages.
Damages for breach of contract must be clearly stated. Evidence of actual damage and its cause must be established. The damages restore the plaintiff to the situation they would be in if the agreement had been fulfilled. In other words, the plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of the purchase. A plaintiff who sues for breach of contract may not recover an amount that is greater than what they would have won if the contract had been fulfilled.
Compensation is not intended to be punishable. The aim is not to punish the offending party for “immoral” behavior, but rather to put the non-offending party back in the position he or she would have been in if the agreement had been fulfilled.
It is damages that are intended to cover what the injured party expected to receive from the contract. Calculations are usually simple because they are based on the contract itself or market values.
These are intended to compensate the injured party for indirect damages other than loss of contract; for example, loss of business profits due to an undelivered machine. Consequential damages are intended to remedy the flow of problems that reasonably arise as a result of a party’s breach of contract.
In order for the injured party to recover, the damages must be a direct result of the infringement and be reasonably foreseeable for both parties when they entered into the agreement. Consequential damages are designed to compensate for secondary or derivative losses due to special circumstances specific to that contract or to the parties.
A court may award a party payment for what he or she deserves for all the work he or she has done before the other party breaches the agreement. Translated from Latin, the term means “as much as he deserved.”
Statutory measure of contractual damages
In California, for example, in very limited circumstances, statutory measures specify damages. These circumstances are usually:
- Obligation to pay only money;
- Agreement on seisin (possession of land or chattels), on the right to mediate, on guarantee or on tacit enjoyment in a lease of real property;
- Alliances against loads;
- Contracts for the transport of land;
- Agreement to deliver notice of termination;
- agreements for the purchase of real estate;
- Leasing of real or personal property;
- Obligations for carriers of passengers, goods and messages;
- Guarantee of the agent’s competence, or
- Other statutory systems that control the transaction
Traditionally, breaches of an insurance contract only allowed damages that were those specified above by courts that would determine the financial loss caused by the violation.
In addition, insurance contracts were subject to fair courts that could work out a reasonable solution to a dispute over a breach of contract where money was not an appropriate remedy. Cheap remedies mean that the court orders the parties to act or to refrain from acting.
Damages specifically specified in the contract as it would be difficult for the parties to prove the exact damage in a breach. In order to protect the parties to the contract, they agree at the time of the contract on what damages will be incurred in the event of a breach.
In modern American case law, judges sit as both law judges and justice judges.
Types of fair remedies include:
Specific performance is usually available when the agreement involves some kind of unique goods or other unusual benefit for the other party, and ordinary damages are not sufficient to make the offended party whole. Properties are often subject to specific performance because, in most cases, each property is unique.
The Court of Equity, which is fair to both parties, will issue a judgment requiring the infringing party to fulfill its part of the settlement specified in the contract. For example, if a party has paid a premium for fire insurance but the insurer refuses to acknowledge the existence of the insurance, the court would require the insurer to acknowledge the existence of the insurance and pay the benefits promised by the insurance.
In such a situation, the trial court would leave to the parties the obligation to determine the dollar amount of benefits available to the insured.
Termination of contract
If the court finds that the insurance contract was entered into as a result of fraud or mistake, the contract which is the subject of the dispute may be “revoked” (revoked from its inception as if it had never existed). This is an indemnity usually given when both parties agree to terminate the contract or if the contract was created through fraud, misrepresentation or concealment of material facts, or mistake of material facts. For details on the action in case of cancellation, see Termination of – 2nd Edition available as a paperback and as a Kindle book or on amazon.com by searching for the title.
The insurance contract is rewritten by the court with the new contract that reflects the parties’ real intention. Reforming an insurance policy requires a valid agreement to begin with and is often used when the parties had a misconception when the agreement was drawn up. The fair remedy of the Reformation enables the insurance contract to allow each of the parties to reap the benefits of the contract which they thought they had made and to correct errors in transcribing the agreement into the written contract.
Limitation of damages by agreement of special circumstances
When a contract is terminated in accordance with its terms, the damages are limited to what arose before the termination. If the agreement contains a provision that allows termination without reason with due notice, but the party breaks by terminating without allowing the notice period to expire, the damages are limited to what could potentially occur during the notice period. For example, an insurance is incorrectly canceled before its expiration damages can occur if the insurance is not reimbursed and a loss occurs.
When the breach of contract is partial, there are no potential damages. The plaintiff can only recover damages from the time of failure to perform to the time of the trial. Damages may not be recoverable for expected future deficiencies.
Watch the next video for more on injuries.
(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his internship to the position of insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as a lawyer for insurance coverage and claims management and more than 54 years in the insurance industry. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and email@example.com.
Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe.
Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
Write to Mr Zalma at firstname.lastname@example.org; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com. Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos on Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/