قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Insurance / Biometric cases against Amazon may continue

Biometric cases against Amazon may continue



A federal district court has refused to dismiss a suspected class action lawsuit against Amazon.com Inc. by a former employee who claims the company violated Illinois biometric laws.

William Naughton, who worked for two months in 2020 as a "voter" "At an Amazon Fulfillment Center in Joliet, Illinois, the company accuses it of violating the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act by taking scans of his face geometry without his consent and disclosing the information to other parties," according to Monday's U.S. District Court decision in Chicago. William Naughton v. Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com LLC.

The case, originally called Michael Jerinic against Amazon.Com Inc. and Amazon Com LLC. was first filed in state court, and then transferred to the U.S. District Court. Naughton claims in his lawsuit that Amazon never informed him that they were collecting his biometric data; never developed any publicly available storage scheme and guidelines for permanently destroying biometric data; and never received Mr. Naughton's consent for any disclosure or dissemination of his biometric data to third parties, according to the judgment.

"Amazon attacks the sufficiency of Naughton's allegations on a variety of grounds, but in the end no one is convincing," the verdict said.

Among Amazon's arguments was that Mr. Naughton did not reasonably claim that the company "intentionally collected any data that could qualify as biometric data," the ruling said.

The court did not agree. "By claiming that Amazon itself implemented the face scans and demanding that workers submit to these scans as a working condition, Naughton argues that Amazon took an 'active step' in collecting his biometric data," the court said in refusing to dismiss the case. .

Actors in the case did not respond to requests for comment.

In December, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago ruled that the Illinois Supreme Court should decide whether violations under the BIPA occur each time an illegal biometric scan is performed. in a case that will determine the potential liability of companies under the law.

Catalog


Source link