قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Insurance / A video explaining why there is no cure for bad faith that is not insured

A video explaining why there is no cure for bad faith that is not insured



Watch the full video at https://rumble.com/vf6z1v-a-video-explaining-why-there-is-no-tort-remedy-for-non-insurance-bad-faith. HTML? mref = 6zof & mrefc = 2 and at https://youtu.be/wf_si02jebc [1965653] The Supreme Court of California faced the question of "an insurance company's violation of the treaty sounds like damages when it retroactively transfers a premium it knows it is not. guilty. '

In Jonathan Neil & Associates v. Jones a dispute arose between Jones Trucking and Jonathan Neil & Associates after an examination of Jones' operations found the trucking company outsourced to other trucking companies. A rule governing the state's assigned risk plan required Jones Trucking to pay for the subcontractors' insurance. The insurer Cal-Eagle tried to retroactively collect increased premiums from Joneses and brought in Jonathan Neil & Associates, a fundraising agency. However, the Supreme Court of California has previously refused to extend the right to damages to breach of non-insurance agreements. The question asked was about unbelievable conduct that does not include a claim that entitles an insured to damages. The court rejected the extension of damages.

"Introducing an obligation in good faith and fair trade from the insurer to [plaintiffs] would" create a serious conflict of interest for the [I] insurer "by forcing it to protect both [plaintiffs’] and Gonzalez's interests. “The plaintiff, as a third party, has no contractual relationship with the insurer and cannot sue the insurer for breach of the implied agreement of good faith and fair trade. In such an argument, the court applied the law of the California Supreme Court Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman & # 39; s Fund Ins. Company (1988) 46 Cal.3d 287 (Moradi-Shalal).

The Supreme Court found that a third party claiming – a person injured by the insured's alleged negligence – does not have a private right to sue the insurer for unfair settlement methods.


© 2021 – Barry Zalma

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to employment as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance management, insurance fraud and insurance fraud almost [insurersandinsurersHealsoactsasanarbitratorormediatorforinsurance-relateddisputesHepracticedlawinCaliforniaformorethan44yearsasaninsurancecoverageandclaimslawyerandmorethan52yearsintheinsuranceindustryHeisavailableathttp://wwwzalmacomandzalma@zalmacom

Mr. Zalma is the first recipient of the first annual Claims Magazine / ACE Legend Award.

For the past 53 years, Barry Zalma has devoted his life to insurance, insurance claims and the need to defeat insurance fraud. He has created the following library of books and other materials to enable insurers and their claims staff to become insured.

Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma ; Go to Barry Zalma videos on Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the library for insurance claims – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims- [195659014] bibliotek / Read posts from Barry Zalma at https://parler.com/profile / Hymn / post; and Read the last two issues of ZIFL here.


Source link