قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Insurance / A video explaining exceptions to intentional acts

A video explaining exceptions to intentional acts



See the full video at https://youtu.be/GbNnNF1-a_A [195659003] Intentional documents

I Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Cook The court was faced with the legal question of whether an individual's homeowner's insurance provides coverage when that person is sued for wrongful death after killing a person in self-defense. On February 20, 2002, the defendant Alfred S. Cook killed Richard A. Barber, the deceased, after a disagreement over a business arrangement that was out of control. The decedent had entered Cook's home without permission. During their discussions, Cook, armed with a gun, withdrew to his bedroom to retrieve a 12-gauge shotgun and then returned to the living room, where the deadly confrontation occurred.

Cook was charged with a number of offenses, including murder. in the second degree stood trial and was acquitted on all counts in the indictment. The jury concluded that the prosecutor failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the 120-pound chef had no legal justification for firing the 360-pound decedent, who had previously attacked and injured Cook after he refused to leave Cook's home

They found no cover and believed that there was no other interpretation than that the actions were intentional.

In a case where "the policy language does not refer to an intentional act but rather contains an exception concerning" assault and / or battery committed by an insured * * * or another person. " The application of the exclusion does not depend on the perpetrators' mental state or whether [injured person] was the intended victim. "When the perpetrator was convicted of battery on the applicant, the exclusion applies regardless of the perpetrator's mental state.

1978, California Supreme Court in Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co . 71 ] treated a shooter who resulted in the victim's death. Regardless, it still led to the California Supreme Court finding a need for defense and damages. The court concluded that Hartford had no obligations regarding Dr. Lovelace's intentional acts in the murder of Dr. Clemmer but was obliged to


© 2020 – Barry Zalma

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now restricts his. If there was an unintentional behavior during the shooting, he would be guilty of defending. practice of working as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, fraud and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He also acts as an arbitrator or mediator for insurance-related disputes. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims lawyer and more than 52 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and zalma@zalma.com.

Mr. Zalma is the first recipient of the first annual Claims Magazine / ACE Legend Award.

For the past 53 years, Barry Zalma has devoted his life to insurance, insurance claims and the need to defeat insurance fraud. He has created the following library of books and other materials to enable insurers and their claims staff to become insured.

https://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/ Last read two issues of ZIFL here.

Go to Barry Zalma videos on Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921 [195659005] Read posts from Barry Zalma at https://parler.com/profile / Zalma / posts [19659004] Listen to Podcast: Zalma on Insurance https://anchor.fm/dashboard/episodes Zalma on Insurance

Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/channel / UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg /

Go to insurance claims library -https: //zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/

https://visitor.r20.constantcontact.com/manage/optin?v= 001Gb86hroKqEYVdo-PWnMUkV7pkuOtkiv6oakpgK33CNlNAYW-WBlLCOZFtgvpSdcL7R-tsWKfMVqG6fEuvmM7Hh7gUEJ7yKOdgHDbGl_cGA5% 1965 [1965] [1965] [1965] [19659059]
Source link